Joyce Tzu Chun Chang Ran an Immigration Fraud Scheme? (Maybe)

The case of Joyce Tzu Chun Chang is rather unique. On one hand, you’ll see articles portraying her as an education entrepreneur who is affiliated with multiple institutions.

On the other hand, you’ll see media reports accusing her of running an immigration fraud scheme.

Seeing the uniqueness of this case, I thought it would be best to get to the truth and help you figure out which side of the story to believe:

Who is Joyce Tzu Chun Chang?

According to online press releases and her interviews, Joyce Tzu Chun Chang is an enterpriser with decades of experience in the education sector.

Joyce’s ventures into other industries, such as mining and hotels, were also highlighted in the interviews. She claims that she encountered challenges such as economic fluctuations and the COVID-19 pandemic, but she displayed resilience and unwavering commitment to her “NEVER NEVER GIVE UP” philosophy.

However, according to media reports, she was involved in a major immigration fraud scheme.

More on the scheme below:

Joyce Tzu Chun Chang’s Involvement in One of The Largest Immigration Fraud Schemes Ever

Joyce Tzu Chun Chang has been at the center of a significant immigration fraud controversy. The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) announced the results of Project Husky, a five-year investigation into a large-scale alleged immigration fraud scheme, which began in 2015. The investigation was initiated after Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada officials identified suspicious documents submitted as part of permanent residency applications. These documents appeared to be nomination certificates from the Government of Yukon issued under the Yukon Business Nominee Program, but were confirmed to be non-genuine.

Source: Gov. of Canada

Five individuals, including Joyce Tzu Chun Chang, faced charges for alleged violations of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and the Criminal Code between July 2013 and September 2016. The charges were related to the production of false documents intended to facilitate immigration to Canada. Joyce Tzu Chun Chang, along with the other accused, was scheduled to appear in Richmond Provincial Court on December 23, 2020.

In December 2023, Joyce Tzu Chun Chang was found guilty of running the Yukon immigration fraud scheme. Additionally, a tweet from Andy Lee labeled her as an “Immigration fraudster” and “Organized criminal,” also noting her as a donor to the Liberal Party of Canada, suggesting potential illegal activity.

Four Richmond residents, including Chang, were charged in connection with falsifying immigration information for 67 people. The prosecution in the case argued that the immigration scammers, including Chang, bribed officials in Yukon as part of their operations.

It was among the biggest cases of immigration fraud in Canada. There was a lot of press coverage of the matter.


However, by the time I’ll be posting this article, you won’t find much information about this case when you’d look up Joyce Tzu. More on that in the next section:

Is Joyce Tzu Chun Chang Trying To Spread Misinformation?

When you look up “Joyce Tzu Chun Chang”, you won’t see the news articles talking about her involvement in the immigration fraud scheme.

Instead, you’d see articles praising her as an industry leader:

There are a ton of promotional articles talking about her expertise and how she is a prominent figure in Canada.

Some of these articles portray her as a motivational figure for others.

Usually, there’s nothing wrong with posting such promotional articles, everyone does that. However, in this case, it’s a blatant attempt of reputation laundering.

Reputation laundering is an unethical practice which involves spreading misinformation on the internet to bury facts and negative media.

It’s clear that the marketers of Joyce Tzu are trying to hide her criminal past with these promotional press releases. Reputation laundering is extremely harmful because it fills the web with deliberate misinformation and allows criminals and scammers to get away with their crimes.

There are many examples of online crooks using reputation laundering to get away with their illicit activities.

A Brief Explanation of Reputation Laundering:

Reputation laundering is the practice of covering up or erasing misdeeds, negative business practices, or illegal actions of a company or individual.

The key aspects of reputation laundering are:

  • It is a niche industry that has grown up around the need for companies and individuals to change public perception of their actions. This includes PR firms, lawyers, lobbyists, and other “fixers” that help clients portray themselves in a more positive light.
  • Tactics used include making donations to universities, charities, and other institutions, aligning with sports teams, and using disinformation and “astroturfing” (creating fake grassroots movements) to obscure the truth.
  • Reputation laundering is different from legitimate reputation repair, which involves fixing real problems within a company and developing a positive image based on their actions. Laundering seeks to cover up illegal activities and bad practices.
  • Reputation laundering allows kleptocrats, oligarchs, and politically exposed persons to distance themselves from the illicit source of their wealth and transform their public image, making it difficult for compliance and law enforcement to detect any wrongdoing.
  • This practice undermines democratic institutions and norms by manipulating public perception and enabling the flow of tainted money into Western economies. Governments have been slow to address the “enablers” that facilitate reputation laundering.

In summary, reputation laundering is an unethical industry that allows companies and individuals to cover up misdeeds and present a false positive image to the public.


I’m hoping this article helped you figure out the truth about Joyce. Let me know your thoughts about the entire ordeal in the comments.

Share This Article
  • This case certainly presents a complex picture of Joyce Tzu Chun Chang. Understanding the dynamics between media representation and actual legal outcomes is crucial for forming an informed opinion.

  • It’s interesting to see how reputation laundering is being used strategically in some cases. This article provided some valuable insights into the practice and its implications for public perception.

  • The contrast between the image of Joyce Tzu Chun Chang in press releases and her portrayal in media reports is stark. It raises questions about the authenticity of online profiles and the power of PR.

  • The article provides a good overview of the situation, but I think it’s also important to wait for the legal process to fully unfold. People are presumed innocent until proven guilty under the law.

  • The topic of reputation laundering is intriguing, especially how it intersects with the democratic process and law enforcement. More awareness of this issue is needed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *